Tamara – also known as Tamara-Land – has taken on broader implications with the advent of AI and digital revolutions. People are in different rooms – some communicating on cell phones and smart watches with people worldwide. Nevertheless, the core principle still applies: the meaning derived from storytelling in each room by its inhabitants constitutes a function of each person's respective pathways of arrival. Tamara is more than a metaphor. It reflects how
people navigate meaning because even with digital, you can only be in the room you are in, and much more is going on in so many other rooms, all at once. People scramble to keep up with the shifts and reframing of meanings across many simultaneous enactment stages. In a large organization, there is room in buildings across continents in different time zones.
One of the recent revelations shows that storytelling proves necessary but insufficient for sensemaking and sensegiving. Storytelling is more than sensemaking. We use our five senses to interpret 10% from words, tones, and body language. However, approximately 90% of storytelling's meaning remains subconscious, intertextual, contextual, and intersubjective. This situation calls for deeper levels of analysis in our research. Simply sorting the words gathered or the body language filmed into categories cannot access the deeper, subterranean meaning in Tamara. "Storytelling' is necessary but not sufficient to elaborate a relevant representation of the object under study" (Savall et al., p. 2). Can we help people in organizations achieve an extra layer of storytelling in communication, coordination, and cooperation? Tamara researchers and consultants can support clients in restorying and releasing Trauma and Stuck Thoughts. This aims to reach the root cause that masks the authentic self. The seven steps are called PER (Processes of Embodied Restorying) and VIEW (Vibrations of embodiment; Internal stuck stories, emotions, and thoughts; Energy metric on a scale of 1 to 10; and Waves of collapsing choice). "The creation of a symphonic 'storytelling' is born, which will generate an increase in performance. This implies that managers fully assume their role as managers of activities and people, i.e., as conductors, trainers, coaches, and leaders" (Savall et al., 2024, p. 28).
The PERVIEW framework (Boje & Rosile, 2025) brings a quantum-somatic approach to Tamara in a socioeconomic storytelling methodology. Its seven steps – Characterize, Externalize, Sympathize, Revise, Strategize, Rehistoricize, and Publicize – follow the VIEW protocol:
This matters especially in Tamara-Land because storytelling does not occur in isolation. It happens within waves of affect, trauma residues, and symbolic environments. Meaning is not only encoded in words but also emerges through energetic resonance, silence, gesture, tone, and bodily memory.
For instance, in Disney's cast-member training, stories are not simply narrated – they are choreographed. Scripting, costume, tone, and sequence layers shape what counts as a "good guest interaction." However, beneath this surface, multiple unofficial stories about burnout, surveillance, or creative resistance are enacted in what I call underground Tamara rooms (Boje, 2019). Turning to SEAM constitutes one way to accomplish a more socioeconomic analysis of Tamara-like organizations.
The Socio-Economic Approach to Management (SEAM), developed by Henri Savall and colleagues (2008), offers a complementary diagnostic and intervention methodology. One of its signature methods, the Mirror Effect, turns transcripts of organizational discourse into scripts. They are then performed back to leadership teams, surfacing contradictions, hidden costs, and the theater of organizational dysfunction.
In Tamara's research and consulting, Lacan's mirror stage concept provides a powerful psychoanalytic parallel to organizational identity formation within fragmented storytelling environments. Just as the infant misrecognizes a unified image of itself and forms the "Ideal-I,"
organizations in Tamara-Land – navigating multiple, simultaneous storytelling rooms – often construct an idealized, cohesive self-image through branding, mission statements, and strategic narratives. Nonetheless, this wholeness is a fiction, masking the underlying fragmentation of voices, agendas, and energies. The Mirror Effect in SEAM similarly reflects disparate scripts to organizational actors, inviting a recognition or misrecognition of coherence. PERVIEW consulting draws on this process by restorying from beneath the surface narrative, allowing leaders to confront the tension between their "Ideal-Organization" and employees' lived, polyphonic experiences. In this way, the mirror stage functions not just as a metaphor, but as a method, revealing how organizations enter an Imaginary Order of self-concept while needing dialogic and embodied processes to reconcile the fractured realities within.
In Theatre of SEAM, Grace Ann Rosile and I propose that SEAM is not merely a systemic diagnosis – it is meta-theatre. The organization becomes a stage for staging, with scenes rewritten through co-authored restorying and intervention. Importantly, SEAM practitioners measure hidden costs in categories such as absenteeism, rework, and lost opportunities – many of which are narrative, shaped by silent scripts and fractured communication (Boje & Rosile, 2002).
In "Tamara Land Fractal Change Management," Boje and Svane (2013) introduce three narrative dynamics that flow through organizational change:
These elements resonate with PERVIEW's seven steps, particularly in the move from Characterize (naming the fractal pattern) to Publicize (choosing which future version to perform). As we note, "Fractal patterns form and reform through social-material enactment, and change must emerge within those recursive loops" (Boje & Svane, 2015, p. 9).
Disney offers a perfect fractal case. At one level, it is the ultimate managerialist control narrative – a perfectly scripted brand experience. However, beneath the surface, cast members tell polyphonic living stories, improvise with guests, and form communities of resistance or creativity. These dynamics embody what we call fractal storytelling fields.
In this age of AI, hybrid work, trauma-informed leadership, and digital overwhelm, SEAM and PERVIEW prove essential. SEAM brings economic rigor and structural feedback; PERVIEW introduces embodied inquiry and nonlinear transformation. Together, they offer consultants, leaders, and change agents a way to:
Tamara no longer serves solely as a play or a metaphor. It becomes a critical condition for understanding how meaning, power, trauma, politics, and transformation unfold across a multiverse of stories, rooms, and bodies.
Boje, David M. (2001). Narrative methods for organizational and communication research. SAGE Publications.
Boje, David M. (2008). Storytelling organizations. SAGE Publications.
Boje, David M. (2019). Stories of the storytelling organization: A postmodern analysis of Disney as “Tamara-Land.” In S. Linstead (ed.), Postmodern management theory (pp. 421–459). Routledge.
Boje, David M., & Rosile, G. A. (2002). Theatre of SEAM [Unpublished manuscript]. Available from: https://davidboje.com/655/ORM_Storytelling_in_Action_BOOK/Theatre_of_SEAM_27JUNE02.pdf
Boje, David M., & Rosile, G. A. (2016). Restorying and quantum storytelling: Transforming the analysis and intervention process. In D. M. Boje & R. J. Hatch (Eds.), Life storytelling: Narrative inquiry in daily practice (pp. 67–85). Routledge.
Boje, David M., & Rosile, G. A. (2025). PerView Coaching Manual: Processes of Embodied Restorying and VIEW. PerView.org Publications.
Boje, David M., Rosile, G. A., Carlon, D. M., Downs, A., & Saylors, R. (2013). Storytelling diamond: An antenarrative integration of the six facets of storytelling. Organizational Research Methods, 16(4), 557–580. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113481670
Boje, David M., & Svane, M. S. (2015). Tamara land, fractal change management: In between managerialist narrative and polyphonic living stories. Proceedings of the Sc. MOI Conference.
Bonnet, M., Savall, A., & Zardet, V. (2019). Socio-economic management systems: New challenges for performance. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Lacan, Jacques. (1949/2006). The mirror stage as formative of the I function as revealed in psychoanalytic experience. In É. Laurent, J.-A. Miller, & B. Fink (eds.), Écrits: The first complete edition in English (pp. 75–81). W.W. Norton.
Lacan, Jacques. (1977). The four fundamental concepts of psychoanalysis (A. Sheridan, Trans.). W.W. Norton. (Original work published 1964).
Lacan, Jacques. (1981). The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book II: The ego in Freud's theory and in the technique of psychoanalysis 1954–1955 (S. Tomaselli, Trans.). Cambridge University Press.
Lacan, Jacques. (1991). The seminar of Jacques Lacan, Book I: Freud's papers on technique 1953–1954 (J. Forrester, Trans.). W.W. Norton.
Lacan, Jacques. (2006). Aggressivity in psychoanalysis. In Écrits (pp. 82–101). W. W. Norton.
Rosile, G. A., Boje, D. M., & Saylors, R. (2020). Quantum storytelling and anticipatory aesthetics: The self-correcting enterprise. Tamara Journal for Critical Organization Inquiry, 18(1), 9–24.
Savall, Henri (2003). Value-added auditing: A true tool of corporate governance. ISEOR.
Savall, Henri, & Zardet, V. (2008). Mastering hidden costs and socio-economic performance. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Savall, Henri, Zardet, V., Bonnet, M., & Savall, A. (2011). Research methods in socio-economic management. ISEOR & Information Age Publishing.
Savall, Henri, Zardet, V., Bonnet, M., & Savall, A. (2024). Presentation of SEAM and opening up on storytelling approaches. In D. M. Boje (Ed.-in-Chief) & A. Savall (Vol. Ed.), Business storytelling of socioeconomics (Vol. 5, pp. 3–30). World Scientific Publishing Co.
Original PDF: 05_TAMARA_22_2025_Boje.pdf | DOI: 10.7206/tamara.1532-5555.29 | Vol. 22, No. 1/2025